Undocumented immigrant Jose Antonio Vargas gets school named after him
The school in Mountain View, Californnia, will now hold the name of Jose Antonio Vargas, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who came to the United States from the Philippines in 1993 when he was 12.
"I don't really have words for how meaningful this honor is, I've been speechless for a few days," Vargas, 37, told CNN. "I hope that this is a school where students and their families feel welcome in America, no matter where they come from."
The goal is for the school near San Jose to open for grades K-5 in 2019, according to Mountain View Whisman School District documents.
The school board approved the naming last week after Vargas was one of five people whose names were suggested for the new school by members of the community.
Laura Blakely, president of the school board, told CNN the district was looking to name the school after someone who embodied the value of education.
"He's just a really inspirational leader," Blakely said of Vargas. "If [students] hear Jose's story, we hope it will empower them to focus on their education, work hard and make a difference in the world."
Blakely said the district includes families from all over the world, from Latin America to Europe to Asia.
"The students see their story in his story," she said.
As a product of the district's schools, Vargas said he was overwhelmed by "this totally unexpected and deeply meaningful honor."
"I think every undocumented immigrant in this country wherever you are ... from the big regions to the small towns, we're defined by our communities. I grew up in that community. This feels so special," he said.
While the award was an honor to him, some have taken to social media to express their anger that "an illegal immigrant's" name is on a school. One person posting on the Twitter account of Vargas' organization referred to him as "a cheat and a liar."
'Most misunderstood issue in American society'
Vargas wrote in a 2011 New York Times Magazine column that his grandfather had paid $4,500 for a pretend "uncle" -- who was a coyote, or people smuggler -- to bring Vargas to the United States under a fake passport and name.
Vargas remains an undocumented immigrant who received a notice to appear before a judge after being detained in 2014. However, he says the notice was never filed and no action resulted.
"So basically, like the 11 million immigrants in this country, I am in limbo land," he said.
Vargas also said he's been openly vocal about what it means to be undocumented and that immigration is the "most misunderstood issue in American society." Part of that misunderstanding, he says, is what led to the misuse of the word "illegal."
"It's inhumane for news organizations to call these kids and their parents illegal," he said. Branding people "illegal," he says, makes them seem less than human.
Vargas said he found it interesting that some of the over 1,000 immigrant children being detained in Texas are the same age as the children who would attend the school with his name.
"Those kids are being locked up right now because we actually don't think they deserve humanity," he said. "The kids locked up in cages should be in classrooms, not detention centers, not locked up like livestock."
In 2011, Vargas founded the nonprofit media and culture organization Define American. According to its website, the organization "uses the power of story to transcend politics and shift the conversation about immigrants, identity, and citizenship in a changing America."
CNN aired details of Vargas' life story in the 2014 film "Documented," which he wrote and directed about the U.S. immigration debate.
Vargas has also written for numerous publications as a journalist, including The New Yorker. He worked for Huffington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Philadelphia Daily News. He was part of the The Washington Post team that won the Pulitzer Prize in 2008 for its breaking news coverage of the Virginia Tech massacre.
Children and parents are being separated at the border. Here's what we know
While officials trade blame over who's responsible and what should happen next, the practice is drawing growing attention from lawmakers, advocacy groups and everyday Americans.
With accusations flying and details emerging at a rapid pace, here's a quick look at some of the major questions about what's happening -- and what we know so far:
Why are families being separated?
The Trump administration announced a new policy in May, saying authorities would criminally prosecute anyone who crosses the border illegally. The result: While they face prosecution, parents are now held in federal prisons -- where their children can't be held with them.
Previous administrations largely opted not to pursue criminal charges against people who crossed illegally with children, referring them instead mostly to immigration courts.
Where is this happening?
Administration officials say that this is only happening to families who enter the United States illegally, crossing between ports of entry.
The American Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy organizations say that's not true. These groups say they've documented cases of parents who've claimed asylum at ports of entry and also had their children taken away.
Department of Homeland Security officials maintain that aside from prosecutions, they only separate adults and children if a familial or custodial relationship cannot be verified, or if they are concerned about the well-being of the child.
Is this new?
Yes and no. More children are being separated from their parents at the border as a result of the Trump administration's new "zero tolerance" policy -- around 2,000 since May, according to the latest statistics officials have released. And that's no accident; officials have indicated they implemented the new policy to deter more immigrants from coming to the United States.
But family separations were happening before officials announced the policy.
In April, the Department of Health and Human Services told The New York Times that approximately 700 children had been taken from families at the border in the six preceding months.
This had also occurred in some individual cases under past administrations as well -- but not at the scale we're seeing currently.
It has long been a misdemeanor federal offense to be caught illegally entering the country, punishable by up to six months in prison and a $5,000 fine. But previous US administrations generally didn't refer everyone caught for prosecution. Those who were apprehended were put into immigration proceedings and faced deportation from the country, unless they qualified to pursue an asylum claim.
Is it working the way administration officials expected?
No, as internal Department of Homeland Security documents obtained by CNN show.
Administration officials predicted the zero-tolerance policy would deter immigrants from trying to enter the United States illegally. Instead, publicly released data showed a roughly 5% uptick in the number of people caught crossing the border illegally in May when compared to figures from April, including a big jump in unaccompanied children.
What's happening to the kids after they're separated from their parents?
Most are taken to facilities run by the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement. These facilities were originally set up to house unaccompanied minors -- children who crossed the border without parents or legal guardians. As a result of the administration's new policy, these so-called shelters are also increasingly housing children who crossed the border with their parents and were subsequently separated from them.
Currently there are a total of more than 11,700 children in the office's custody, according to officials.
Immigrant rights organizations say holding children in such facilities -- especially children who were taken from their parents -- is cruel and inhumane. Officials have categorically denied such accusations, characterizing them as misleading reports from advocacy groups and media outlets.
"It is important to note that these minors are very well taken care of. Don't believe the press. ... We operate according to some of the very highest standards in the country," Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said Monday.
How do parents and kids find each other again?
Officials are giving immigrant parents a toll-free number to call to help find their kids. Lawyers and organizations say the overwhelmed system isn't working -- and that some parents have even been deported without their kids.
Federal agencies have said they seek to reunite families, but have offered no policies that put the onus on the government to do so.
I've heard administration officials say their hands are tied. Is that true?
In a contentious White House press briefing Monday, Nielsen reiterated a false claim administration officials have made many times: that only Congress can stop family separations from happening by changing the law.
"It's a law passed by the United States Congress," Nielsen said. "Rather than fixing the law, Congress is asking those of us who enforce the law to turn our backs on the law and not enforce the law."
CNN legal analyst and former New Jersey Attorney General Anne Milgram said it's "completely a falsehood" to say family separations are required by law.
"Nothing could be further from the truth. The law does not require this. I think everything she said confirmed that this is a policy and it's a choice that they're making."
Who supports this approach?
Most Republicans, according to a new CNN poll.
In the poll, conducted by SSRS and released Monday, 58% of Republicans said they approved of the family separations, while two-thirds of Americans said they disapproved of the practice.
Even as criticism mounts, the administration has doubled down on its defense, arguing it's no different than what happens when any US citizen is charged with a crime and jailed.
"Illegal actions have and must have consequences," Nielsen said Monday. "No more free passes, no more get out of jail free cards."
And who's against it?
Doctors, religious leaders, the United Nations and politicians on both sides of the aisle have criticized the administration's use of family separations.
Last week, the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics told CNN it was "nothing less than government-sanctioned child abuse." Catholic leaders have slammed the practice as "immoral." And over the weekend, former first lady Laura Bush penned a blistering critique of the practice.
"Our government should not be in the business of warehousing children in converted box stores or making plans to place them in tent cities in the desert outside of El Paso," she wrote in the Washington Post. "These images are eerily reminiscent of the Japanese-American internment camps of World War II, now considered to have been one of the most shameful episodes in US history."
How does the administration respond to accusations of child abuse?
Nielsen flatly denied that family separations amount to child abuse.
"We have high standards. We give them meals and we give them education and we give them medical care. There are videos, there are TVs," Nielsen said in response to a question from CNN's Jeff Zeleny on Monday. "I visited the detention centers myself."
Asked whether children were being separated from their parents as pawns to get border wall funding, Nielsen denied that assertion.
"The children are not being used as a pawn. We're trying to protect the children," she said, "which is why I'm asking Congress to act."
What role does Congress have in all this?
Democratic lawmakers have been pushing hard on this issue, making trips to the border and speaking out publicly about what they've observed -- and what they haven't been allowed to see.
Some in Congress have suggested they'll pass legislation to block the separations. But like so much about immigration, that's much tougher than it sounds.
Senate Democrats are pushing a measure that would address family separations alone. Republicans are pushing a broader approach that ties the family separation issue to other immigration policies.